From Insight
to Action
A practice guide for network members and community leaders — built from what 65 leaders figured out in New York.
Each one self-paced.
Each one facilitated.
All of them actionable.
The briefing book tells you what happened in New York. This guide helps you do something with it. Each section is built around one idea from the summit — with the research behind it, a self-paced reflection, and a facilitated session you can run with your community.
Why most communications don't work
Simple contagion — memes, viral content, broadcast messages — spreads fast through weak ties. One exposure is enough. Complex change — behavior, norms, community — spreads slowly, through trusted relationships, requiring multiple reinforcing sources. Most communications budgets are built for the first kind. Most of our goals require the second. And when awareness outpaces adoption, it doesn't plateau — it actively undermines the change you're trying to create.
Learning outcomes
- Distinguish simple vs. complex contagion
- Audit your own work for the wrong model
- Understand why awareness can backfire
Self-paced reflection
How much of your current communications is designed for simple contagion — impressions, reach, open rates? How much is designed for networked trust? What would you change if you started from trust as the goal?
Facilitated session — 45 min
Source: Morgan Lasher, Unify America — drawing on Damon Centola, Change: How to Make Big Things Happen
The four ingredients of community
Community requires four things: belonging (why do I stay?), purpose (why are we here?), learning (can I contribute and grow?), and impact (does my voice matter?). Most communities are strong on one or two and weak on the rest. The most important of the four is impact — close the loop visibly. When someone asks for highlighters and they appear at the next meeting with attribution, that's what builds trust.
Learning outcomes
- Apply the four-ingredient framework to your community
- Identify which ingredients are missing
- Design one experiment to close the gap
Self-paced reflection
Score your community 1–5 on each ingredient: belonging, purpose, learning, impact. Which is lowest? Write down one experiment you could run in the next 30 days to strengthen it.
The four ingredients
- Belonging — Members say "we," not "they."
- Purpose — A shared, stated reason for gathering.
- Learning — Peer knowledge is valued. Members leave with new thinking.
- Impact — Feedback loops are closed visibly.
Warning signs
- High attendance, low retention → weak belonging
- Every meeting feels unfocused → unclear purpose
- Every gathering is a panel → weak learning
- Good gatherings, no follow-through → no impact
Facilitated session — 60 min
Source: Morgan Lasher, Unify America
Distributing ownership without losing the community
Most communities are held together by one person's energy, relationships, and follow-through. Letting go is uncomfortable — especially when you built it. But if you're the only one who can hold it together, it isn't a community yet. It's a following. Distributed leadership builds resilience and deepens belonging — people who have a role feel ownership, and people who feel ownership stay.
Learning outcomes
- Honestly assess your community's dependence on you
- Identify one role you could hand off in the next 60 days
- Run the Creative Tensions format with your own group
The honest question
Could your community survive if you stepped away for three months? If the answer is no — or if the question makes you uncomfortable — that's the work. Write down what would break, and who could own it.
Facilitated session — Creative Tensions format, 45 min
Source: IDEO.org — Creative Tensions exercise
Design your next event as a communications strategy
An event is the physical manifestation of a communications strategy. How you show up at an event is what you're telling the world you do. Before building an agenda, start with two questions: what does this community want to achieve, and who needs to be in the room for them to get there? Every design decision flows from those answers — not from what you've done before.
Learning outcomes
- Reframe your next event as a communications strategy
- Design from audience and ethos, not from agenda
- Apply the narrative reframe technique to your language
Self-paced reflection
Take your next event. Write its communications goal in one sentence — not the program, the goal. Does your current agenda serve that goal? What language might be working against you?
The narrative reframe
- "Reduction in vacancies" → "wealth building, putting people in homes"
- "Crime" → "public safety"
- Tactics divide. Goals unite. Name the goal before you name the tactic.
Design principles from the room
- Start with: who needs to be here, and why?
- Main stage: 18 minutes max. Attention is a design constraint.
- Surprise and delight as a principle, not a nice-to-have.
Facilitated session — 45 min
Source: De'Ara Balenger and Gabriel Barrientos, Rockefeller Foundation Connected Leaders Platform
Listening as a practice
In a moment defined by noise and urgency, our default mode is to be ready to respond — to find the "me too," to add our own experience, to offer the fix. That mode shuts down the very thing we're trying to build. Belonging is built through being heard. Being heard requires someone willing to set down their own agenda long enough to actually listen. Most of us have never practiced that as a skill. It is a skill.
Learning outcomes
- Notice your default listening habits
- Practice the count-to-eight technique
- Use facts and feelings questions to go deeper
Try this at home
Ask someone: "Tell me about the most memorable gathering you've ever attended." When the urge to respond comes — and it will — count to eight before saying anything. If they start talking again before you reach eight, reset and keep listening.
Facts questions
- What happened next?
- Paint a picture in words.
- Can you give me an example?
Feelings questions
- How did it make you feel?
- What were you thinking when it happened?
- How has it changed you?
Facilitated session — 30 min
Source: Emily Janssen — listening session, Network Leaders Summit
Still open
Three questions the room didn't resolve — and probably shouldn'tCan you start simple and build toward complex — or does the sequence matter so much that you're better off starting over?
How do you build community when everyone is burned out and time-starved? What does "enough" actually look like right now?
How do we build across political differences when the stakes feel existential — and what conditions make that possible?