The recent public releases of two entirely different studies and recommendations of how to do philanthropy more effectively stand in interesting contrast with one another, especially if one of the goals was to get people talking about the ideas each contain.
In recent years, a number of foundations have taken a refreshingly open approach to admitting when things go wrong. Talking about foundation failure was even a session at the Network’s 2007 fall conference in Chicago. Now, in its debut issue, the new peer-reviewed journal about philanthropy, Foundation Review, contains an insightful analysis of why publicly “sharing and reflecting upon mistakes” is essential to philanthropic practice and foundation transparency.
Poll-tested messages are great. Focus groups rock. There is security in knowing exactly which buttons to push to get the desired outcome. But the world has changed. Today — especially due to the rise of social media — we have to base our change and advocacy campaigns on a new paradigm. It’s no more top down/command and control. Instead, the key is giving people what they want and need to be our best messengers, and encourage them to “just do it.”
So, what’s a communicator to do?
Just had a good news/bad news experience – quite literally. I was invited to listen to a panel earlier today that featured several journalists and bloggers talking to other journalists and bloggers about how to step up their philanthropy beat coverage during these tumultuous economic times.
Hat tip to fellow Communications Network members Will Bohlen of the German Marshall Fund of the United States and communications consultant Denise Graveline. Through a link Bohlen put on the Network’s Facebook page and one of Graveline’s “don’t get caught” blog posts, I heard about GMF’s first-ever audio annual report, which is featured on the Network website.
- About the Network
- Our Board Members
- Our Staff
- Job Opening: Executive Director
- Fall Conference